The landlord is entitled to receive the proper amount of
rent paid by the tenant at the proper place and time.
The lease agreement will stipulate the rent due date. Most
lease agreements state the rent is due and payable in full, free from
deductions on or before the 1st of every month. The tenant would then be in
breach of contract if the rent was still outstanding on the 2nd of the month.
The lease agreement will determine the payment date – a
tenant and landlord might negotiate that the rent is paid on the 15th of the
month. If so, the tenant's rent only becomes due on the 15th and if not paid on
the 16th – the tenant is in breach of contract.
There is no law which provides the tenant a 7-day grace
period to pay their rent.
Yes, TPN recommends that landlords perform a credit report on all adults over the age of 18 applying for rent.
In terms of the National Credit Act Regulations 18 (4) (e) and (5) you must first obtain the consent of each applicant before you access their credit report. TPN has drafted the consent clause for your use.
If the applicant tenant refuses to provide consent for you to perform his / her credit check – you are then not entitled to access the credit report. It is recommended that you decline the tenant’s application for rent.
No, this is a criminal offence in terms of the Rental Housing Act.
The landlord or Property Practitioner cannot change the locks, remove the front door or take any action which effectively locks the tenant out from the property or denies him peaceful occupation of the property without a court order.
The landlord does have legal remedy via the courts to obtain legal eviction of the tenant. It is therefore advisable to take immediate action against delinquent tenants.
You are able to view all PDF
in the latest versions of Safari but if you wish to complete an editable PDF
you would be required to download Adobe Acrobat reader.
Please visit the below sites
and check system requirements
https://get.adobe.com/uk/reader/
https://helpx.adobe.com/reader/system-requirements.html
You are able to view all PDF in the latest versions of Safari but the editable fields will not be visible on your Mac or Apple device while using Safari.
If you want to complete an editable PDF using your Apple device you will be required to download Adobe Acrobat reader.
Please visit the below sites and check system requirements
https://get.adobe.com/uk/reader/
https://helpx.adobe.com/reader/system-requirements.html
Direct marketing is when the landlord or property manager approaches the tenant directly either in person or via mail or email for the purpose of offering to supply the tenant with rental accommodation.
Direct marketing does not include circumstance when the tenant approaches the landlord / property manager as a result of advertising in a newspaper or magazine or other general marketing.
This item in the Schedule creates a suspensive condition. A suspensive condition is a provision in a contract that has to be met or fulfilled for the particular contract to be valid. Should a suspensive condition in the provisions of the agreement not be met, the agreement will automatically be unenforceable as if it was never concluded. Item 1.9 creates the opportunity for the landlord to elect whether the payment of the deposit will be deemed to be a suspensive condition.
In a case where the landlord selects “yes”, the lease agreement will only be valid once the deposit has been paid and so doing will create a suspensive condition. The implication of this will be, that should the tenant not pay the deposit, within the time allowed, the lease agreement will never come into being and the landlord can immediately, on the lapse of the time period, advertise and place a new tenant. The benefit of this provision would be that a landlord does not have to wait out any time period, before signing a new lease agreement with a new tenant, in a case where the original tenant does not pay the deposit within the allowed time.
In this case however, the landlord also loses the ability to claim any damages from the tenant in respect of the lease agreement due to non-payment of the deposit.
Should the landlord select “no” in this provision it will have the effect that should the tenant fail to pay the deposit within the allowed time, the landlord will have to place the tenant on terms in terms of clause 23 before he will be in a position to cancel the lease agreement and find a replacement tenant.
There are benefits and risks to both scenarios. This is an important provision in a lease agreement to take note of and ensure you select the applicable option for each individual lease.
In a multi-let lease, it is important to
give the full description of the premises, including the unit, door and/or room
number so that there is no ambiguity as to what exactly would constitute the
rented premises in a building. This would also help a Tenant understand their
obligations in respect of a rented premises in a building.
We would encourage the Landlord to
attach a floor plan of the building setting out the units and their
corresponding door and / or room number. It would be advisable to demarcate the
rented premises to the Tenant in the floor plan so that there can be no
uncertainty in this regard.
To read our article on the multi-let lease , click https://bit.ly/TPNLegalArticle
A mandatory disclosure is a mandatory (compulsory) document
when the where the Landlord/ Owner discloses to the Tenant / Purchasers any
latent (obvious) or patent (not obvious) information regarding the condition of
the property which may have a bearing on whether the Tenant / Purchasers makes
an offer to rent / buy the Premises.
A mandate agreement cannot
be accepted unless the Mandatory Disclosure Form is completed and signed by the
landlord. This is regulated by section 67 of the Property Practitioners Act.
The Landlord’s Disclosure does not provide any warranties
and does not negate the requirement for completing a joint incoming and
outgoing Inspection Document.
Please note: the wording in this document is
prescribed in the regulations to the PPA and can be subject to audit and fines
if not used as required.
We are aware that the prescribed form only refers to sales,
however the latest versions of the form in your Pack has been amended to suit
rentals and sales.
Please always ensure you are using the latest version.
The definition of "Fair Wear and Tear" is an important
one because it often causes conflict between Landlords and Tenants.
It is precisely for this reason that Clause 17 of the Lease
Agreement has been so carefully and specifically drafted. Currently there is no
legislative definition of "Fair Wear and Tear", but generally it is
deemed to be damage that occurs due to the ordinary use of the
premises by a Tenant over the passage of time or the ordinary operation of
natural elements.
Some examples of "Fair Wear and Tear" would be the
following:
- old, warped window frames,
- paint that has faded in the ordinary
course,
- plaster that has cracked as a building settles and
- carpets worn as the
result of being walked on.
Conversely, the following would constitute damage due to negligence and would be for the tenant's account:
- windows damaged as a result of being slammed,
- walls damaged due to nails or screws,
- paint discoloured as a result of cigarette or candle smoke,
- carpets discoloured due to pets or stains and
- kitchen counters scratched due to cutting.
It is important that the definition of "Fair Wear and Tear", together with the provisions of Clause 17 are carefully explained to Tenants so that they are fully aware of their obligations insofar as the maintenance of the property is concerned.Please read our blog article for more interesting information https://mrisoftware.tpn.co.za/blog/what-is-fair-wear-and-tear/
You will notice that the “Duration” clause in the CPA compliant Lease Agreement differs from the “Duration” clause in the non-CPA compliant Lease Agreement. This is due to the fact that, in terms of section 14 of the CPA, as read with Regulation 5 of the CPA, a fixed-term agreement (in this case, a Lease Agreement) may not subsist for longer than 24 months, unless the Landlord, as the supplier, can show a “demonstrable financial benefit” to the consumer, in this case the Tenant.
The Courts have yet to interpret precisely what constitutes a “demonstrable financial benefit”, but in the case of a Lease Agreement the view is that it would be something like no increase in Rental, or a property that is close to the Tenant’s office so that the Tenant can spend less money on travel. The question has been asked as to whether a Landlord may alter the clause to specify a longer duration. The answer is unequivocally no, as one may not contract out of the provisions of the CPA. As such, in the case of the CPA compliant Lease Agreement, where a Landlord wants the Lease Agreement run for a period longer than 24 months, clause 1.25 of the lease agreement MUST be completed.
You will notice that clause 6 in the CPA compliant Lease Agreement differs from clause 6 in the non-CPA compliant Lease Agreement. The reason for this is that in terms of section 14 of the CPA, where the Initial Period of a Lease Agreement comes to an end and the Tenant has not communicated the desire to either renew or terminate the Lease Agreement, the Lease Agreement will continue on a month to month basis.
The implication of this is that the Lease Agreement will no longer be deemed to be a fixed-term contract and will rather be a periodic lease. As such, section 14 of the CPA will no longer apply, the 20 business days’ notice provision will fall away and either party may cancel the Lease Agreement on one Calendar Month’s notice to the other party. Given that section 14 obviously does not apply to the non - CPA compliant Lease Agreement, the Month – to –Month provision is obviously not relevant and in the Non-CPA compliant Lease Agreement the onus is on the Tenant to notify the Landlord of the fact that he or she wishes to renew the Lease Agreement.
This clause only appears in the CPA compliant
Lease Agreement and it is a very important clause. In terms of section 14 of
the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 ("the CPA"), the onus is only
the Landlord or the Agent, as the case may be, to notify the Tenant of the fact
that the Initial Period is due to expire and to set out all of the Tenant’s options
in this regard.
This notification MUST be given not more than 80, but
not less than 40 business days prior to the expiry of the Initial Period. This
leaves a grey area where notification is not given within the requisite period,
which has not yet been interpreted by the Courts and could potentially cause a
dispute between the parties. As such, it is important for an Agent or Landlord
to diarise precisely when the 80 business days period is to begin and ensure
that the requisite notice is given so as to avoid any ambiguity.
In order to enforce any House and Body Corporate Rules, the
Tenant is required to be familiar with such Rules. In terms of the Rental
Housing Act 50 of 1999, whenever a Lease Agreement is reduced to writing, a copy of the relevant House or Body Corporate
Rules MUST be annexed to the Lease Agreement. This requirement is unfortunately
often overlooked. If a Tenant has not had sight of the Rules, he or she cannot
be expected to comply with them. As such, it is essential that such Rules be
annexed to the Lease Agreement so as to ensure that they can be enforced.
It is essential that there is no ambiguity regarding the date
and manner in which Rental is to be paid by the Tenant. Section 5 of the Unfair
Practises Regulations to the Rental Housing Act 50 of 1999 (which apply to all
residential rentals) specifies that unless a Tenant is otherwise notified in
writing, Rental is payable at the dwelling on the first day of each month. This
is vague in the sense that there is no real guidance insofar as the actual
manner in which the Rental is to be paid. Is it by cheque, in cash, via EFT? It is for this reason that you will note that this clause
10 specifies that the Rental must CLEAR in the Landlord’s nominated bank
account by the 1st (First) of every month. If the word CLEAR was not
inserted, Tenants would be able to effect payment on the 1st
(First), but the funds would potentially only clear a few days later or, in the
case of payment by cheque, a few weeks later, thereby prejudicing the Landlord.
The Deposit may be any amount that the
parties agree to and need not only be the equivalent of 1 (One) month’s Rental.
If there is any doubt as to the integrity of the Tenant, a larger Deposit
should be taken. The Deposit must be held in an interest-bearing account and
may not be utilised during the subsistence of the Lease Agreement. Apart from
being a legal requirement, the reason for this is twofold: firstly because by
utilising the Deposit early, the amount of interest generated will be affected
and secondly, because if the Deposit is whittled down early, there is no
guarantee that there will be any funds left upon termination of the Lease
Agreement to cover damage to the Premises, arrear Rental, lost keys and the
like.
At the end of the Lease Agreement the
Deposit, less any deductions must be refunded to the Tenant within 14
(Fourteen) days. In terms of the Rental Housing Act 50 of 1999, a Deposit may,
in certain circumstances, need to be refunded within 7 (Seven) or 21 (Twenty-One)
days, but for the purposes of clarity, this clause stipulates 14 (Fourteen)
days.
Interest will accrue to the party
selected in clause 1.9. This is in terms of Regulation 9 of the Code of Conduct
for Estate Agents which stipulates that unless the parties agree in writing to
whom interest earned on such money must be paid, the interest will
automatically accrue to the Estate Agents Fidelity Fund. This would obviously
not be applicable to Landlords who are, in terms of the Rental Housing Act 55
of 1999 obliged to refund the interest to the Tenant.
Find out more here https://mrisoftware.tpn.co.za/blog/rental-deposits-demystified-what-when-how-and-why/
Both an ingoing and an
outgoing inspection are a legal requirement in terms of the Rental Housing Act
50 of 1999 (“RHA”) and hence the importance of this clause. The purpose of the
inspection is obviously to ascertain the existence of any defects, and it should
be noted that a general viewing by the Tenant of the Premises does not
constitute an inspection and hence the requirement in this clause that any
defects be recorded in writing and annexed to the Lease Agreement. This ensures
no ambiguity when the outgoing inspection is done. It is also a legal
requirement in terms of the RHA that the outgoing inspection be performed
within 3 (Three) days prior to the expiration of the Lease Agreement, and hence
the content of this clause. From a practical perspective, it is obviously
advisable to do the inspection as close as possible to the actual termination
date in case any further damage is caused by the Tenant prior to him or her vacating.
Watch our interesting
webinar about Property Inspections here
Clause 17 sets out the various obligations of the parties
and, as such, any items that the Tenant is not specifically required to
maintain and repair will be for the account of the Landlord. It is a legal
requirement that the Tenant notify the Landlord, in writing, of any repairs
that need to be affected which are not for the account of the Tenant. Usually,
the cost of these repairs is for the account of the Landlord. Where, however, the Tenant fails to notify
the Landlord of such damage and the Landlord becomes aware of the damage at a
later stage i.e. a small leak becomes a spray of water and damages the carpets
in the Premises, then this clause specifically provides that the costs of repairing
the damage will be for the account of the Tenant. This position is confirmed by the case of Radloff v Kaplan 1914 EDL 357, which position has been upheld in multiple more recent cases.
In
terms of both section 4 of the Rental Housing Act 50 of 1999 (“the RHA”) and
the Unfair Practises Regulations, a Landlord must be granted access to the
Premises, provided that reasonable notice is given to the Tenant.
Despite
this requirement, many Tenants refuse access and raise issues of privacy during
the subsistence of the Lease Agreement and, as such, the Tenant’s attention
should be drawn to this clause. Reasonable access includes bringing prospective
tenants, purchasers, and agents to view the Premises.
Read more in our article https://mrisoftware.tpn.co.za/blog/is-your-tenant-refusing-access-to-the-property/
Parties are free to agree as they
deem fit insofar as the maintenance of the Premises is concerned and, as such,
this clause clearly sets out the duties of the Tenant insofar as maintenance of
the Premises and behaviour are concerned. It is important to note that in terms
of this particular clause, the Tenant is obliged
to maintain all geysers, water taps and accessories. The reason for this is
due to the fact that most Tenants are under the impression that the Landlord
must maintain all these items, which results in the Landlord being called out to
fix every tiny leak or loose tap. Obviously, in the case of a geyser bursting,
the Landlord would be responsible, but where it comes to ensuring that rivets
are not loose and rust is monitored, this is specified as being an obligation
of the Tenant.
The exact nature of this clause should be explained to the
Tenant so as to avoid any confusion. Furthermore, 17.1.12 refers back to the
definition of "Fair Wear and Tear". It is important that the Tenant be aware of
the fact that where he or she fails to maintain an item, for example, allows a
key to rust in a lock, and the item is subsequently damaged or needs to be
repaired, this will not constitute “Fair Wear and Tear” for the purposes of the
outgoing inspection. This position is confirmed in the case of Sarkin v Koren 1949 (3) SA 545 and Green v Heyman 1963 (3) SA 390 (T).
It is essential to ascertain
whether or not the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 (“CPA”)
apply in each instance, because this will determine the rights and
obligations of the parties. This clause alerts the parties to the fact that the
CPA may or may not apply and can seem rather confusing. In reality, however,
determining whether or not the CPA applies is actually quite simple and can be
summarised as follows:
If the tenant is an individual,
including a Sole Proprietorship, then the provisions of the CPA will always
apply.
If the Tenant is a Company, Close
Corporation, Trust or Body Corporate (“juristic entity”) with an asset value or
annual turnover of more than R2 000 000.00 (Two Million Rand), then the
provisions of the CPA will not apply (note that when calculating the threshold,
gross and not net amounts apply).
If the Tenant is a juristic entity
with an asset value or annual turnover of less than R2 000 000.00 (Two Million
Rand), then the provisions of the CPA will apply, save for the provisions of
section 14.
The Duration, Automatic Renewal
and Notification clauses deal specifically with the provisions of section 14
and this is the reason that they differ/are not applicable in the non – CPA compliant Lease Agreement.
The purpose behind this clause is simply to give the Landlord two options in the event that more than one Tenant signs the Lease Agreement. In such an instance, should Rental not be paid, the Landlord has the option to either take action against one of the Tenants for the full amount, or both of the Tenants together in whatever ratios he deems appropriate. This clause means that the Landlord is not obliged to split the arrear Rental between the parties in equal proportions, which is particularly important when it becomes obvious that one Tenant is experiencing financial difficulty, but the other is able to pay. The paying party would then claim the portion that he or she was not responsible for from the non-paying party.
This clause relates to section 16 of the Consumer
Protection Act 68 of 2008.
In terms of this section, whenever a Tenant is
approached by an Agent or Landlord directly and the Tenant subsequently
concludes a Lease Agreement as a result of such approach, the Tenant has 5
(Five) business days within which to elect to cancel the Lease Agreement,
without providing any reason and without needing to pay any penalty.
Merely
advertising properties on the internet would not constitute direct marketing,
but inserting a pamphlet featuring bargain properties into an individual’s
mailbox very well may.
This clause deals specifically
with the provisions of section 14 of the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008
(“the CPA”)and stipulates that a Tenant is entitled to cancel a Lease Agreement
at any time during the subsistence of the Lease Agreement, for any reason, on
20 (Twenty) business days notice to the Landlord or Agent, subject to a
reasonable penalty.
There are guidelines insofar as calculating what
constitutes a “reasonable” penalty, as contained in Regulation 5 to the CPA,
but these guidelines are not definite and still need to be interpreted by the
Courts. It is for this reason that clause 1.28 is so important, because it
allows the parties to agree from the outset what will constitute a reasonable
penalty in the event that the Tenant cancels and therefore avoid a dispute. TPN suggests
between 1 (One) and 3 (Three) months’ Rental, depending on the amount of time
still due to elapse in terms of the Lease Agreement.
Obviously, if a new Tenant
can be found before the existing Tenant vacates, then the clause stipulates
that “reasonable” will be deemed to be the advertising costs and the commission
due to the Agent. This clause is important, because it protects the Agent
against what normally otherwise ends up being a sticky situation. For obvious
reasons, this clause does not appear in the non-CPA compliant Lease Agreement.
Although the landlord’s tacit hypothec exists
automatically at common law, by including this clause in the Lease Agreement,
the Landlord’s rights are strengthened because the Tenant will be made directly
aware of the fact that his goods may be attached and cannot claim ignorance at
a later stage.
The principle behind the landlord’s tacit hypothec is that where
a tenant is in arrears insofar as the payment of rental is concerned, a
landlord is entitled to attach movable goods on the leased premises equal in
value to the arrear rental, together with the costs of recovering such rental.
These goods can then be sold in execution and the proceeds utilized to satisfy
the debt owing to the landlord. It therefore stands to reason that the Tenant
should not be entitled to alienate these goods during the course of the Lease
Agreement.
A suretyship clause is very important
because it provides the landlord with additional security in the event that rental is not
paid. Importantly, when a surety signs as both a surety and a co-principle
debtor, as is provided for in the TPN Suretyship Agreement, the Landlord’s
rights are even further protected because the Landlord need not even claim
amounts owing from the Tenant first, but may rather proceed directly against
the surety for any outstanding amounts. Legally, this is termed “renouncing the
benefit of excussion” and is particularly beneficial in an instance where, for
example, a company is not generating enough profit to pay rental. In such a
case the Landlord would be able to claim the rental directly from the directors
of the company in their personal capacity. In terms o,f the TPN Suretyship Agreement,
the directors will be bound jointly and severally. This means that the Landlord
can elect to split the outstanding amount between the surities or simply claim
the total amount from one surety alone.
It
is vitally important that you get all the relevant documentation form foreign
nationals. All copies of passports should be certified, the originals should be
presented and copies of the relevant visa documentation should
be requested and provided on a yearly basis.
It
is important to take these steps so as to ensure that your risk is minimalised as in terms of Section
42 (1) of the Immigration Act 13 of 2002: “save for necessary humanitarian
assistance, no person shall aid, abet, assist, enable or in any manner help an
illegal foreigner including but not limited to harbouring him or her, which
includes providing accommodation or letting or selling or in any manner making
available any immovable property in the Republic to him or her”
A Natural Person Lease must be signed when the Tenant is a Natural Person or a Juristic Person with both an asset value and an annual turnover of less than R2 million.
A Natural Person is an individual and not an entity as listed below.
A Juristic Person Lease must be signed (regardless of their asset value or annual turnover) if both the Tenant and the Landlord are:
- Companies;
- Close Corporations;
- Body Corporates;
- Partnerships;
- Associations; or
- Trusts.
The word version allows you to upload your own logo and make amendments to your documents.
As a word subscriber, we have also given you access to a free digital signature platform called eSign. eSign allows you to send the TPN LeasePack documents out for electronic signature.
Click here for to find out more about accessing eSign.
When using an apple product like a mac, ipad or iphone the word version of the document may not pull through the correct formatting, this is due to Apple iOS not having Microsoft installed and defaulting the word document to open using Pages.
You are able to bypass this by using the editable PDF supplied in the shop or using the eSign system to complete the document.
Alternatively change your default for .docx documents to open on Microsoft Word if you have it installed.